Commonwealth v. Corbett
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The defendant, a registered pharmacist, was convicted by a judge of the Superior Court, sitting without jury, upon a complaint charging that the defendant sold to one Stilphen “certain articles for the prevention of conception to wit: condoms.” The complaint was brought under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 272, § 21, which has remained in substantially the same form since its original enactment as St. 1879, c. 159, § 1. By that section, “Whoever sells, lends, gives away, exhibits, or offers to sell, lend or give away an instrument or other article intended to be used for self-abuse, or any drug,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. ResnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Commonwealth v. PentzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- People v. ShakunNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jaquith v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Commonwealth v. Van BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Tileston v. UllmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.