Legal Opinion

In re Ritchie

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application by. Charles Ritchie for revocation of a liquor tax certificate.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborne, J.

The petition herein shows, and it is admitted, that at the time of the passage of chapter 112 of the Laws of 1896, on March 23, 1896, known as the “ Liquor Tax Law,” one Philip Easier conducted the liquor business at No. 108 Union avenue, *342under a license issued to him by the board of excise of the city of Brooklyn; that on or about April 10, 1896, said Easier gave up the liquor business, moved away from said premises, and the same remained vacant during, the months of April, May and up to June 16, 1896; that on the last-named day one Adolph Samuely, the above-named respondent, made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Cairns v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re ZinzowNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People ex rel. Bagley v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. In re BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. In re BridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. In re KlevesahlNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API