Legal Opinion

In re Zinzow

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Application to revoke a Equor tax certificate.

1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.

The petitioner, who is a citizén of the state and a trustee of the church hereinafter mentioned,, seeks to procure the revocation of a Equor tax certificate issued to the defendant Peter Schmidt by the county treasurer of Albany county to traffic in Equors at 56 Elizabeth street, in the city of Albany, upon the ground that material statements in the appEcation for such certificate are false and that the defendant is not entitled to hold the certificate.

The applicant stated in his appEcation that the location of the premises where he proposed to carry on business was at 56 Elizabeth street,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. BullionsNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  2. People Ex Rel. Cairns v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. People ex rel. Clausen v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. In re RitchieNew York Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Petition of PlaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Calvary Baptist Church v. CoonradNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. In re Application to Revoke & Cancel Liquor Tax Certificate No. 14,111, granted to McCuskerNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In re KorndorferNew York Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API