In re Bridge
New York Supreme Court
Petition by William Bridge, a citizen, for an order revoking and cancelling the liquor tax certificate, issued to George Mohrmann, by the deputy commissioner of excise of the borough of Brooklyn, city of ¡New York, on the ground that material statements in the application of the holder thereof were false, and that he was not entitled to receive and is not entitled to hold such certifi■cate.
1Opinion of the CourtGarretson, J.
The allegations of the petition are denied, in part, by an answer interposed in form as a pleading in an action, und the respondent asks that a referee be appointed to take testimony and report the evidence to the court. The Liquor Tax Law, § 28, subd. 2, as amended by chap. 312, Laws of 1897. This course *214is not deemed necessary for the reason that there was served with the petition four affidavits which fully sustain the allegations of the petition, and no statement of fact therein set forth is controverted by the affidavit of the respondent also submitted hereon.
This proceeding is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Belden Club v. HilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- In re RitchieNew York Supreme Court · 1896
- In re RulandNew York Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re of the Petition of LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Lyman v. Erie County Athletic ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- In re KlevesahlNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. Lawton v. LymanNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- In re BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.