In re Bridge
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by George Mohrmann from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in-the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 14th day of Kovember, 1898, revoking and canceling the liquor tax certificate issued to him by the special deputy commissioner of excise for Kings county.
1Opinion of the Court
Garretson, J.:
The allegations of the petition aré denied in part by an answer interposed in form as a pleading in an action, and the respondent asks that a referee be appointed to take testimony and report the evidence to the court. (The Liquor Tax Law [Laws of 1896, chap., 112], § 28, subd. 2, as amended by chap. 312, Laws of 1897.) This course is not deemed necessary, for the reason that there was served with the petition four affidavits, which fully sustain the allegations of the petition, and no statement of fact therein set forth is controverted by the affidavit of the respondent, also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Belden Club v. HilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- In re RitchieNew York Supreme Court · 1896
- In re RulandNew York Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re of the Petition of LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Lyman v. Erie County Athletic ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- In re AuerbachNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- In re KlevesahlNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- In re McMonagleNew York Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.