Legal Opinion
In Re Petition of Boat Demand, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 22, 1959No. 57-28PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
The petitioner’s vessel Demand, having exploded and sunk at the Boston Fish Pier on February 3, 1957, its claim for exoneration and limitation of liability herein was denied because of the negligence of the owner. D.C., 160 F.Supp. 833. The claimants’ allegations of damages were tried on May 13 and 14, 1959. It was stipulated that the damages to the respondent Harbor Oil Co., Inc., with respect to its vessel Narmada, were $3,616.-88; that those to the Trawler Oil Corp. were $406.16 with respect to the vessel Gene and Don, and $811.75 with respect to the vessel Sea Bee;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brayton v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Ottenheimer v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- In Re Eastern Transp. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1952
- Petition of Highlands Nav. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Winpenny v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co. v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- In Re the Libel of China Union Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
- Getty Refining And Marketing Company v. Mt Fadi BCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Mt Fadi BCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.