Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint of Midland Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 18, 1968No. Civ. A. 6515PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FACTS
HOGAN, District Judge.
The Motor Vessel “Oreo” is a towboat owned by Midland Enterprises, Inc. In May, 1967 the Ohio River Company was the demise charterer and bailee in possession of the Orco and thirteen barges, each of which were likewise owned by Midland. The barges were each about 200 feet in length and are used for the transportation of cargo. "Whereas an ocean going vessel or Great Lakes going vessel has her cargo facilities within one unitary structure, the cargo facilities of an Ohio River towboat consist of barges. These barges are customarily unmanned and they were in this case.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Just v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Ohio Valley Company, Inc., in Personam, and M/v John Fitzgerald, Her Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc., in RemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- In Re Pacific Far East Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- In Re the Complaint of Oswego Barge Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Complaint of Harbor Towing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- Steuart Investment Co. v. Bauer Dredging Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.