Legal Opinion

Westheimer v. Byrne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1925No. 14900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

The petition of the-plaintiff, omitting formal parts, is as follows :

“(2) That heretofore, to wit, on the 27th day of December, 1921, a contract was entered into between J. D. Cardinell and A. II. Kelley, first parties, and Archie Perkins and T. W. Byrne, second parties, for drilling a well for oil and gas upon certain lands in Pontotoc county, Okla., a copy of said contract being hereto attached, marked ‘Plaintiff Exhibit A’ and made a part of this petition.

•‘(3) That on the - day of December, 1920, and a short time prior to entering’ into the contract hereinbefore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Atwood v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Emmerson v. BotkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Kimmell v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lay v. DwormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. White v. WintSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Tulsa County Fairgrounds Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Simons v. KiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Mistletoe Oil & Gas Co. v. RevelleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API