Legal Opinion
Westheimer v. Byrne
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 19, 1925No. 14900PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
The petition of the-plaintiff, omitting formal parts, is as follows :
“(2) That heretofore, to wit, on the 27th day of December, 1921, a contract was entered into between J. D. Cardinell and A. II. Kelley, first parties, and Archie Perkins and T. W. Byrne, second parties, for drilling a well for oil and gas upon certain lands in Pontotoc county, Okla., a copy of said contract being hereto attached, marked ‘Plaintiff Exhibit A’ and made a part of this petition.
•‘(3) That on the - day of December, 1920, and a short time prior to entering’ into the contract hereinbefore…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Atwood v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Emmerson v. BotkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Kimmell v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lay v. DwormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- White v. WintSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Tulsa County Fairgrounds Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Simons v. KiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Mistletoe Oil & Gas Co. v. RevelleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.