Legal Opinion

State v. Vanness

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 25, 1989No. 38158S; CA A50137PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He claims that the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence obtained after an unauthorized stop. We affirm.

On the evening of February 4, 1987, a motorist approached Deputy Aasen and reported that he had just stopped the driver of a red Ford station wagon who had been driving recklessly. The citizen told Aasen that the driver had appeared intoxicated and had agreed to let the citizen drive him home but that the citizen had to take his family home first. The citizen asked Aasen to watch the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. LindstromCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. TibbetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Villegas-VarelaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. BybeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. KoesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. HamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API