Legal Opinion

Seattle Seed Co. v. Fujimori

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1914No. 11439PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeals from judgments of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered March 11, 1918, upon findings favorable to a seed company, in consolidated actions, one, to recover the price of seed sold, and one for damages on account of the sale.

1Opinion of the CourtMoeius, J.

Appellant A. Fujimori brought an action on behalf of himself and his assignors against respondent, to recover damages for failure of respondent to furnish him and his associates a certain variety of garden pea seed, known as the Alaska, or Early Alaska. Shortly thereafter, respondent brought an action to recover upon a promissory note, given to respondent by appellant and certain of his assignors for the purchase price of this and other seeds purchased at the same time. The cases were consolidated for trial below, and were so treated here. The findings in each case were for the seed company.

Ap…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leonard Seed Co. v. Crary Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Springfield Shingle Co. v. Edgecomb Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Blizzard Bros. v. Growers' Canning Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. E. P. Moorhead v. Minneapolis Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. The Belt Seed Co. v. Mitchelhill Seed Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Nakanishi v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gibson v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Larson v. Inland Seed CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API