Legal Opinion

Harth v. Ten Eyck

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1939No. L. A. 16863PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This cause conies here on motion of plaintiff-respondent for diminution of record. He seeks to have the reporter’s transcript of testimony added to the record heretofore certified by the trial judge.

During the trial of the cause, plaintiff in open court dismissed the action as to defendant 0linger (appellant here). The court thereupon ordered said defendant dismissed with prejudice, which order of dismissal was entered in the minutes of the court. Plaintiff continued to prosecute his action against the remaining defendants, and the cause was submitted on briefs to be filed. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colby v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. James v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Robinson v. Southland Produce Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harth v. Ten EyckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bice v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Yarbrough v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Taper v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API