Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Southland Produce Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1929No. Docket No. 6504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

Respondent originally commenced an action for damages against the defendants Southland Produce Company, a corporation, and Liberty Produce Company, a corporation. Answer was filed by Nick Estrin and Philip Garbus, doing business under the name of “Liberty Produce Company, a copartnership,” and denied that that company was a corporation. The Southland Produce Company did not appear. Upon the day of trial counsel for the plaintiff announced that he had received information that the truck which she alleged had caused her personal injuries had been transferred by the Southland Produce Company to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colby v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Harth v. Ten EyckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Casner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Robinson v. Southland Produce Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API