Legal Opinion
Ventling v. Kraft
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1968No. File 10478PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOMEYER, Judge.
The defendant, Peter A. Kraft, a resident of North Dakota, was personally served with a summons in this action outside the state under the provisions of the "long arm statute", Ch. 163, Laws of 1965. He appeared specially and moved to quash the. service. The motion was granted and this appeal followed.
The single question to be decided is whether the asserted personal jurisdiction over the defendant violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
The statute in question is patterned after the Illinois Civil Practice Act,1 the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- The Austad Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Pennie & Edmonds, a New York PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Block Industries, a Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Bell Paper Box, Inc. v. Trans Western Polymers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.