Legal Opinion
Ex Parte City of Tuscaloosa
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 23, 1999No. 1961569 and 1961581PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Howell Lumber Company, Inc. ("Howell Lumber"), and the City of Tuscaloosa ("the City") appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court after a bench trial. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment in part and reversed it in part. Howell Lumber Co. v. City of Tuscaloosa,757 So.2d 1173 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997). Both parties then petitioned for certiorari review, and we granted their petitions. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, and, as to case no. 1961569, we remand.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
Thi…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Siegelman v. Chase Manhattan BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Battle v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Alabama Power Co. v. City of Carbon HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Hawkins v. City of PrichardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Hart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bean Dredging v. Alabama Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Kowenhoven v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- City of Attalla v. Dean Sausage Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Jefferson County v. AckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Howell Lumber Co. v. City of TuscaloosaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.