Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. City of Prichard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1947No. 1 Div. 282PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This suit is for the refund of license money paid as a gasoline filling service station operator in the police jurisdiction of Prichard. It is for money had and received, which is the appropriate remedy. City of Prichard v. Richardson, 245 Ala. 365, 17 So.2d 451. The suit is authorized by section 332, title 51, Code, although such payment was not made under compul-

sion or protest. The claim is for money paid in the period from May 1, 1942 through April 1944 at the rate of one cent per gallon sold as follows:

May 1942 through December $ 744.54 For year 1943 1266.45

January…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Hook v. City of SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Briggs v. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. City of Carbon HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. City of Andalusia v. FletcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Ex Parte City of LeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Graves v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. City of Prichard v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. City of Mobile v. WooleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API