Legal Opinion

Bean Dredging v. Alabama Dept. of Revenue

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 2003No. 1011664PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Bean Dredging, L.L.C., and Midstream Fuel Services, Inc., appeal from a decision of the Montgomery Circuit Court affirming an order issued by an administrative law judge of the Department of Revenue dismissing their case. Bean and Midstream assert that they are entitled to a refund of $58,863 for State sales taxes paid on fuel and supplies during the period from March 1995 through September 1997.

Bean and Midstream assert that they are entitled to a refund…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Craig Const. Co., Inc. v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Ex Parte Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Ex Parte USX Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Regions Bank v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API