Legal Opinion
Magnifico v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 12, 1998PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
STEIN, J.
This appeal, together with New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. Breen, 153 N.J. 424, 710 A.2d 421 (1998), and Grant v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co., 153 N.J. 433, 710 A.2d 426 (1998), also decided today, requires that we resolve issues of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage under multiple insurance policies that were anticipated by our decision in French v. New Jersey School Board Ass’n Insurance Group, 149 N.J. 478, 694 A.2d 1008 (1997). Our acknowledgment in French, id. at 481, 694 A.2d 1008, that UIM insurance has been characterized as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Royal Ins. Co. v. Rutgers Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Aubrey v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Christy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Lundy v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nowell James v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (071344)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Krohn v. NJ Full Ins. UnderwritersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Pinto v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Botti v. CNA Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance v. BreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.