Adams v. Adams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddiN, Associate Justice.
This is an action for damages claimed to have been suffered by plaintiffs (appellants) because an obstruction which defendants (appellees) placed in a drainage ditch caused an overflow of waters onto plaintiffs’ land. Equity jurisdiction was invoked to obtain a removal of the obstruction ; and jurisdiction was retained to try the- issues of (a) cause of the overflow, and (b) damages, if any, resulting therefrom. We will refer to the parties as they are styled in the Trial Court. After hearing the evidence the Chancery Court held that the overflow was caused…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Chicago v. HuenerbeinIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MackeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Lee v. Crittenden CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Barlow v. LowderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Manila School Dist. No. 15 v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dickerson Const. Co., Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Harlan v. CurboSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Niemeyer v. Lee & Central Soya Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Moore v. City of BlythevilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Fritz v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.