Bruner v. Bearden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Oourt, Hughes County; Geo. Crump, Judge. Action by Lelia Bruner and others, minors, -by next friend and guardian, W. E. Kirby, against J. S. Bearden for money had and received. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called plaintiffs, commenced this action in the district court of Hughes county by filing a petition on the 29th day of January, 1917. This petition alleges, in substance, that Lelia Bruner, Ola Bruner, and McKinley Bruner are minors, and that W. E. Kirby is their' duly appointed, qualified, and acting guardian; that on the 3rd day of -March, 1911, Nick Bruner, the former guardian of. all of these plaintiffs, loaned to the defendant certain sums of money which was the property of the plaintiffs, as follows, to wit: For McKinley Bruner, $430.50; for Lelia…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Water, Light & Gas Co. v. City of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Buddress v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Rossman v. TillenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Arthur Fritsch Foundry & Machine Co. v. Goodwin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Clifton v. MeuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mackintosh v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- In Re Widener's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Sapulpa Petroleum Co. v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Storm v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.