Legal Opinion
George v. Double-D Foods, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1984No. Civ. 69363PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
Defendant Double-D Foods, Inc. appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Jane Pauline George, as administratrix of the estate of Clarence Patrick George, deceased, after a jury trial. The matter was tried on a theory of quantum meruit, to recover the unpaid balance due on the reasonable value of decedent’s services as an executive employee of defendant for a period of 28 months. The jury found the uncompensated reasonable value of decedent’s services to be $96,000 and further found that plaintiff was entitled to interest on that sum from the date…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sprague v. Equifax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- North Oakland Medical Clinic v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gregg M. Lumetta, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States Robotics, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Southard v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.