Legal Opinion
Soble v. Kallman
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1976No. Civ. 47304PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, J.
Plaintiff Lee Soble appeals the dismissal of his action for malicious prosecution after the trial court sustained without leave to amend a demurrer of defendant Dee Jane Kallman to the amended complaint on the ground the action was barred by the statute of limitations.
The amended complaint alleges that on 14 November 1968 Kallman, maliciously and without cause, commenced a civil action for assault and battery against Soble. Kallman served a summons on Soble but took no further steps to prosecute her action. On 30 November 1973 the trial court on its own motion dismissed her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Swaffield v. Universal Ecsco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Luby v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rare Coin Galleries, Inc. v. A-Mark Coin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Friedman v. StadumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gibbs v. Haight, Dickson, Brown & BonesteelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Feld v. Western Land & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Korody-Colyer Corp. v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.