Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wine

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1985PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

We have granted discretionary review in this case to consider again the procedures available to a defendant who has been convicted of a crime and who maintains that his right to one appeal granted by the Kentucky constitution has been lost because he did not receive effective assistance of counsel to prosecute the appeal.

This case began in June 1978 with the indictment of the respondent in the Jefferson Circuit Court in a seventeen (17) count indictment charging him with one (1) count of first-degree sodomy, three (3) counts of first-degree sexual abuse, six (6) counts of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. McIntosh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Hollon v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Harper v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Alford v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API