State v. Bell
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Dallas Circuit Court. The court will not consider the bill of exceptions which is embodied in the transcript in this case, for the reason that the same has not been signed by the judge who tried the cause.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Dallas Circuit Court. The court will not consider the bill of exceptions which is embodied in the transcript in this case, for the reason that the same has not been signed by the judge who tried the cause. R. S. 1889, sec. 2167; Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 622. This being true, defendant’s appeal must be determined from the record proper on which the judgment should be affirmed; the indictment charging the crime in the language of the statute and there being no error prejudicial to the rights of the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtG-antt, P. J.
At the September term, 1893, of the circuit court of Webster county James Bell was indicted for the murder of John Harrison on the second day of September, 1893. He was duly arraigned and the cause continued to the March term, 1894, at which last mentioned term he applied for and obtained a change of venue to Dallas county. In the Dallas court he moved to dismiss the cause on account of certain inaccuracies in the transcript certified by the clerk of the Webster court, which motion was overruled and at the October term, 1894, his case was again continued. He was put on trial at the March…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WienersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- State v. PagelsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State v. FairlambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
- State v. RedemeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Pueblo v. Marchand PazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State v. EnglishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.