Legal Opinion
Cornish v. Dudas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 25, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1719 (RWR)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, an attorney who was previously registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO” or “PTO”), filed a complaint against the defendants 1 alleging, among other things, that the defendants engaged in discrimination by requiring him to sit for the patent examination before being reinstated, violated his First Amendment rights by preventing him from advertising as a registered patent attorney, and violated his due process rights by not providing notice and a hearing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- CSX Trans, Inc. v. Williams, Anthony A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Omar, Sandra K. v. Harvey, Francis J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Hunter v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- In Re Navy ChaplaincyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cal. Ass'n of Private Postsecondary Sch. v. DeVosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- ['GUTTENBERG v. EMERY']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Newland v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Roman Catholic Archdiocese v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Geo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated v. HusisianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.