Legal Opinion
In Re Navy Chaplaincy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 15, 2007No. Misc. Action No. 07-0269. (RMU)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion foe a Preliminary Injunction
1. INTRODUCTION
In the latest phase of this continuing dispute between the plaintiffs (non-liturgical naval chaplains and their endorsing agencies) and the defendants (the United States Navy and various naval officers) (“the Navy”), the plaintiffs move for a preliminary injunction to prevent the Navy from affording preferential treatment to Catholic chaplains by allowing them to remain on active duty past the statutory separation age in order to qualify for retirement pay. The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Cornish v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Dominguez v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- ALLINA HEALTH SERVICES v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.