Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Pennington
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 28, 1999No. Misc. AG No. 13, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
I
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (the “Commission”), by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jill Johnson Pennington (the “Respondent”), alleging that she did engage in misconduct. In the Petition, the respondent was charged with violating Rules 1.5, 1 1.8 2 and 8.4, 3 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. The Petition was referred, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-711(a), 4 to the Hon. William B. Spellbring, of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, for hearing and to make findings…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Berra v. SPRINGER AND STEINBERG, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. JeterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. TolarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.