Legal Opinion · Dissent

Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1992No. 917SC714Published

1Dissent

Judge GREENE

dissenting.

I disagree with the conclusion of the majority that the plaintiff is entitled to stack the underinsured coverage in the Farm Bureau policy issued to George Proctor (Proctor policy) with the underin-sured coverage in the Farm Bureau policy issued to Country Manor Antiques (Country Manor policy). I also disagree with the majority that the plaintiff is entitled to stack the underinsured coverages on the three vehicles insured in the Proctor policy.

On 27 September 1984, the date of the accident, N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21(b)(4) was silent on the right of an insured or owner to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Davidson v. Knauff Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Hamilton v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Aills v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API