Legal Opinion
Williams Pipe Line v. City of Mounds View, Minn.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1989No. Civ. 4-86-648, 4-86-651 and 4-86-656PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
These three cases stem from a petroleum pipeline accident which occurred in Mounds View, Minnesota, on July 8, 1986. The parties seek declaratory and injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages by their various suits and counterclaims. Federal question and diversity jurisdiction are alleged. Now before the court are three motions by Williams Pipe Line Co. (Williams). Two are for partial summary judgment. First, Williams seeks summary judgment dismissing all of Ramsey County’s claims, dismissing all claims of the City of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Friends of the Earth v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luigino's Inc. v. Pezrow CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- NORTH & SOUTH RIVERS WATERSHED ASSOC. INC v. Town of ScituateDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Muehlstedt v. City of Lino LakesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2004
- Soucek v. BanhamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.