Soucek v. Banham

524 N.W.2d 478 (1994)

Jon SOUCEK, Appellant,

v.

Donald BANHAM, Jr., et al., Respondents.

No. C3-94-1203.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 29, 1994.

Review Denied January 25, 1995.

Donald H. Nichols, Nichols, Kaster & Anderson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Surell Brady, Minneapolis City Atty., Edward A. Backstrom, Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ.

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

The issue in this case is the measure of damages a pet owner can recover when police officers shoot and kill a pet. The trial court determined that…