Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. City of Seattle
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LASNIK, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 40) filed by plaintiff Olympic Pipe Line Company (“Olympic”). Defendant City of Seattle (“Seattle” or “the City”) opposes the motion and requests that the Court grant summary judgment in its favor. (Response at 1). For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Olympic’s motion for summary judgment.
II. DISCUSSION
A. Background.
On July 16, 2003, Olympic brought this action seeking declaratory judgment as follows:(a) That the federal Pipeline…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dennis v. O'Day v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, a Foreign Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olympic Pipe Line Company, a Delaware Corporation v. City of Seattle, a Washington Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Olympic Pipeline v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006