Legal Opinion

State v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1982No. 27540, CA A24441PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court imposing costs in the amount of $3,866.60. The sole question raised on appeal is whether defendant can be required to pay costs incurred by the state following the filing of a felony information against him in district court. We affirm.

This case is before us for the second time. The first time, State v. Haynes, 53 Or App 850, 633 P2d 38, rev den 292 Or 108 (1981), we interpreted the language of ORS 161.665 providing that “[c]osts shall be limited to expenses specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant” to allow imposition of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. HestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. KuehnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API