Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. White Line Motor Freight Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1937No. 43714PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, J.

In 1935 the W. B. Ewer Construction Company erected an office building for the Maytag Company in the city of Newton, Iowa. This building stood on the north side of an east and west street. It is faced with stone. The building was erected and the roof put on by September, 1935. There ■were three foremen on the job, all employees of the construction company. Paul H. Hatfield was foreman of the stone and brick work. The street upon which the building faced was 54 feet wide, from the office building on the north side of the street to the Maytag factory on the south side of the street. The condi…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kisling v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Dewey v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Wosoba v. KenyonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Wheeler v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Kadlec v. Al. Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haszczyn v. Detroit Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Brown v. Krakowski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949
  3. Haszczyn v. Detroit Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API