Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haszczyn v. Detroit Creamery Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1937No. Docket No. 123, Calendar No. 39,476Published

1Dissent

"Wiest, J.

(dissenting). I am of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, with costs and without a new trial.

The statute is a safety measure and one who violates its provisions and is injured thereby, even under attempted and unsuccessful stoppage of traffic, is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. It was not only a violation of the statute but, in and of itself, a negligent act to fasten tbe rope across the street in the manner shown. Defendant may have been guilty of negligence but I am satisfied that plaintiff, who directed the placing of the rope and then went up…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Bush v. GoodnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. French v. Inhabitants of BrunswickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1842
  4. Hatfield v. White Line Motor Freight Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Langdon v. City of West AelisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API