Legal Opinion
State v. JOANNA V.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 2003No. 22,876PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} Respondent, Joanna V., raises three issues on appeal. Because two issues were not preserved, we address only the denial of Respondent’s motion to withdraw her guilty plea. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
{2} In August 2000, Respondent, then fourteen years old, was placed in the custody of the Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD). Susan Camrud (Camrud), an attorney, was appointed as Respondent’s guardian ad litem (GAL). Approximately ten months later, in May 2001, the State charged Respondent with one count of disorderly conduct contrary to NMSA 1978, § 30-20-l(A)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ReyesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Patterson v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BarnettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BoergadineNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. VincentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. JanzenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Steven B.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.