Legal Opinion

State v. Janzen

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2007No. 27,174PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} The State appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to suppress evidence obtained as result of a search of Defendants’ home. Below, the district court concluded that the warrantless search of Defendants’ home was illegal under Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006). On appeal, the State raises a number of arguments as to how the district court erred in its application of Randolph and its decision to grant Defendants’ motion to suppress. We hold that the State failed to properly preserve its arguments below and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. FigueroaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of New Mexico, Ltd. v. BrawleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API