Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1901No. S.F. No. 2738PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appellant presented to the superior court an application to have admitted to probate as a last will and testament a certain document annexed to her petition, which she alleged to be a true copy of a will executed by her husband, and fraudulently destroyed in his lifetime. The respondent filed a contest of the petition, and upon the hearing the following facts were shown: The decedent made and signed an olographic will, sufficient in form, upon two separate sheets of paper, on the first of which was written all of the will except the last two lines and his signature. After he had made this…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Brandt v. KroghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Winkler v. JerrueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Henry v. Continental Bldg. Etc. Assoc.California Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API