Legal Opinion
Cirillo v. Sardo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 1996No. 14047PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
In this wrongful death action, the plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’2 motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly found that their action against the decedent’s fellow employee, Frederick E. Sardo, was barred under General Statutes § 31-293a of the Workers’ Compensation Act,3 and that the statute’s “negligent operation of a motor vehicle by a fellow employee” exception did not apply. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are undisputed. On September 20, 1989, the decedent,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Kakadelis v. DeFabritisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arias v. GeisingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Stiles v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Cirillo v. SardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Craig v. Mohyde, No. Cv94 031 60 56 S (Apr. 18, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Muscetta v. Kimball, No. Cv01 0186306 SConnecticut Superior Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.