Legal Opinion

Craig v. Mohyde, No. Cv94 031 60 56 S (Apr. 18, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 18, 1997No. CV94 031 60 56 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT PEOPLE'S BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 121) ISSUE

Should the defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted on the ground that there is no genuine issue of material fact that the defendant was a mortgagee not in possession of the property, and therefore, the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because it owed no legal duty to the plaintiffs regarding the existence of lead paint on the premises?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 5, 1995, the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API