Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1978No. 77-493PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

Appellant’s first contention is that the Ohio statutes relating to capital punishment, R. C. 2903. 01, 2929.03 and 2929.04, are unconstitutional. This contention is without merit. State v. Bayless (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 73, 357 N. E. 2d 1035; State v. Black (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 262, 358 N. E. 2d 551; State v. Downs (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 47, 364 N. E. 2d 1140; State v. Shelton (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 68, 364 N. E. 2d 1152.

The second issue raised by appellant concerns the applicability of B. O. 2941.25(A) to his sentencing. That section reads:

“Where the same conduct by defendant can be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. GapenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HicksOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. LovejoyOhio Supreme Court · 1997

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API