Legal Opinion

State v. Gapen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2004No. 2001-1518PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} In this death-penalty appeal, defendant-appellant, Larry James Gapen, raises 14 propositions of law. We find one proposition to be meritorious and reverse Gapen’s convictions for breaking detention and the R.C. 2929.04(A)(4) specifications that allege murder in the course of breaking detention. We find that none of his other propositions of law has merit and affirm Gapen’s remaining convictions. We have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors and have compared Gapen’s sentence of death to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A)…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API