Legal Opinion

State v. Lovejoy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1997No. 96-686PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

The issue presented to us in this case is whether the doctrines of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel apply when a jury finds a defendant not guilty as to some counts and is hung as to. other counts. We find that these doctrines do not apply where the inconsistency in the responses arises out of inconsistent responses to different counts, not out of inconsistent responses to the same count. In such cases, we further find the prosecution is entitled to retry the hung-jury counts provided that other criteria, such as sufficiency of the evidence, are met to allow retrial.

*443A review of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. TrewarthaOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API