Kaniewski v. National Action Financial Services
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING .IN PART AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART DEFENDANT’S “MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO DISMISS” AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR SECOND SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court is a “Motion for Summary Judgment and to Dismiss,” filed by Defendant National Action Financial Services. The matter has been fully briefed and the court concludes a hearing is unnecessary. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2). For the reasons stated below, the court will grant in part the Motion and deny without prejudice in part the Motion.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Barany-Snyder v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bridge v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Obenauf v. Frontier Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- McDermott v. Randall S. Miller & AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Boozer v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Bridge v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.