Legal Opinion

Boozer v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 18, 2019No. 2:17-cv-14190Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RICARDO BOOZER, Case No. 17-cv-14190 Plaintiff, v. Paul D. Borman United States District Judge ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC, Elizabeth A. Stafford Magistrate Judge Defendant. eee OPINION AND ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 23) AND (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1) Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC (ERC), a debt collection agency, dialed the wrong number and called Plaintiff Ricardo Boozer, instead of the third-party debtor,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API