Legal Opinion
Rammell v. Idaho State Department of Agriculture
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 2009No. 34927Published
1Opinion of the Court
210 P.3d 523 (2009)
Rex RAMMELL and Lynda Rammell, d/b/a Elk Country Trophy Bulls, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
IDAHO STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 34927.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 2009 Term.
June 1, 2009.
Rehearing Denied July 7, 2009.
Runft & Steele Law Offices, PLLC, Boise, for appellant. Karl J. Runft argued.
Honorable Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Steven W. Strack argued.
J. JONES, Justice.
Rex and Lynda Rammell appeal from a final order issued by the Department of Agriculture (the Department) imposing $29,000.00 in fines…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Lamar Corp. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.