Schonberg v. Perry
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
Sami Sehonberg, appellant, a diamond merchant doing business in Antwerp, sued for and recovered from Anna Perry, respondent, a Beverly Hills housewife and his cousin, $35,000. He charged Anna had fraudulently breached a contract involving the purchase of diamonds which she had persuaded him to allow her to negotiate with one Michelangelo Fucile, who was her friend. The contract was made in 1958 in Antwerp or Genoa, or both, and was to be performed in Genoa. Sami also asked for exemplary damages and the jury awarded him $40,000. This appeal is the result of a judgment in a second trial.
In the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Windeler v. Scheers JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Carpenter v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978