Legal Opinion
Fondren v. Schmidt
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 7, 1986No. CV-R-83-43-ECRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff has objected to the June 28, 1985, Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Phyllis Halsey Atkins, wherein the Magistrate recommends that Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint be dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice. The primary basis for the Magistrate’s recommendation is that the pleading doesn’t reasonably apprise each defendant (five are named) of the specific role each is alleged to have played in the transactions described in the federal question causes of action. Those claims for relief are grounded in purported…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sue De La Cruz v. James TormeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. First Federal Sav. of Arkansas, FADistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1988
- Meyer v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of DickinsonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1987
- A. R. v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- T.P. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022