Legal Opinion
Meyer v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Dickinson
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided March 23, 1987No. Civ. A1-86-168PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONMY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint against defendants Mesling and First National Bank and Trust Company of Dickinson [the Bank], alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [RICO], 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.; state RICO claims, N.D.CentCode § 12.1-06.1 — 01(2)(d); breach of contract, and fraud. Both Mesling and the Bank have moved this court to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
Plaintiff alleges that, on or about…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Natlional Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Guerrero v. GatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000