Legal Opinion

Todd v. McCloy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 10, 1938No. 4-5360PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.

The city of Monticello would issue bonds to defray expenses of certain projects, two of which are matters of concern in this appeal.

First, it is proposed to construct a stadium upon land owned by the city, but lying without the corporate limits. Such land adjoins a city-owned park. Part of the park lies within and part without the corporation.

Second, is the city permitted to obligate itself, through .bonds, for the construction of . . . “suitable ornamental standards and electric lighting equipment to provide modern ‘white way’ electric illumination” . . . for designated streets?

The city…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher Electric Co. v. Bath Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Marylanders for Sports Sanity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Myhand v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Cherokee Village Homeowners Protective Ass'n v. Cherokee Village Road & Street Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Ragsdale v. Hargraves, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. McCastlain v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API