Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Engineering Co. v. Ladd
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 1961No. Civ. A. 2997-59PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is an action against the Commissioner of Patents under 35 U.S.C. § 145, for an adjudication that the plaintiffs are entitled to a patent on an application that the defendant has rejected.
' The application was filed by Carl Berger and assigned to the plaintiff Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, on July 27, 1953, and is numbered 370533. It is entitled “Reconstitution of Frozen Biological Cellular Material”. It involves a process for rapidly thawing and melting frozen blood. The specific process, in a general way, consists of passing the frozen blood through…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Carl Peter KrimmelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Isenstead v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
- Besser v. Merrilat Culvert Core Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Andrew John MansonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1964
- Application of Jean Maurice GazaveCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Henry K. Puharich v. Edward J. BrennerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.