Legal Opinion

Henry K. Puharich v. Edward J. Brenner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 25, 1969No. 22286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, a disappointed applicant for a patent, brought an action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking a judgment awarding him a patent. The district court gave judgment to the Commissioner. We affirm.

I

Appellant claims to have invented a device that is effective to expand extra sensory perception and assist in the study of the so-called extra sensory phenomenon. It is a kind of cage, one that apparently looks something like a quiz show think booth, which has electrical installations in the screen casing for generating electrical currents and impulses.

Appellant says…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. In Re PerrigoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. In Re OberwegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  5. Johns-Manville Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SaetherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Titanium Metals Corp. v. MossinghoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  3. Fregeau v. MossinghoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API